Register for Forum |  Forum Login |  Forum Control Panel  



Recently Added Films
Featured Festivals & Events

New Festivals & Events


 
Apr
05
    

By Bryan Newbury
Twitter: @asiplease

As a reviewer, I am usually loath to do what I just did. Namely, first-person reviews or reactions. I always cringe seeing that “I” on a page, whether it is here or in the New York Times. Certain subjects demand stripping any pretense of objectivity, though, and American: The Bill Hicks Story is definitely one of them. This is because Bill Hicks is my comedian. I caught his One Night Stand in Chicago on the cusp of my formative years and it changed me as a person. I made sure to tape it on second airing and proceeded to memorize every bit in it… despite the fact that, unlike Mr. Hicks, I did not consider comedy a viable career option. That thirty minutes was up there with anything Pryor had ever done. It was all mine.

Until five years later, when Bill Hicks started popping up in all sorts of places. The most memorable encounter I had with Hicksmobilia was at the apartment of a person I didn’t know from Adam. He lived upstairs from a friend of mine and had the beer or taco sauce or whatever we were lacking at that particular moment. In the corner of his living room was a framed portrait of Bill Hicks. It took three glances to confirm, but there it was. Memories are tricky things, and they often graft embellishments into the psyche, but I swear it was an oil painting. Now, that is commitment to a comedian.

A few of these experiences were enough to find out that Bill Hicks had a following. In his case, the word ‘following’ is more what we’d ascribe to the Dalai Lama or Rabindranath Tagore than, say, Bob Saget. As the years go by, that following gets larger and more fervent, revelatory and more high profile. (I am thinking here of Keith Olbermann’s ‘Bill Hicks is still ahead of his time’ segment.) As is the pattern with genius, this all comes well after Hicks ‘left in love, in laughter, and in truth,’ largely because his message and material become more incredibly incisive with every passing war, crisis or bastardization of the aesthetic landscape.

If Hicks is your comedian, you’ve no doubt seen every bit of video available, listened to each album – listened to it backwards as well – know every bit by heart from Randy Pan the Goat Boy to We Live In A World to Ding Dong (the last one is incredibly timely) and have by this time discovered that there were layers of meaning and bits of cosmic truth that become more evident in 2011 than in 1999. You don’t need my recommendation to see American. Tough shit. You’re getting it.

When the word ‘animation’ came up in the press releases, I quailed a bit. It was the only thing that could possibly make this a film short of five-star accolades. With the subject, it is hard to go wrong. The minute the film stalls, just go to any Hicks clip. You’ve won the audience back. No doubt the filmmakers were cognizant of the fact that, with such a rabid following, lousing this up would be unpardonable. The idea of a half animated feature was brave. I expected it to fail. I was wrong.

Harlock & Thomas (Graham Smith should be mentioned here as well) did a smashing job of it, juxtaposing still images in ways that convince the viewer he is watching live action. After several viewings, it is hard to distinguish what was their handicraft and what was video footage. It could’ve been jarring. It could’ve stalled the flow of the film. It didn’t. This technique seems pretty revolutionary, and it makes me wonder why more filmmakers aren’t using it. The short answer, most likely, is that pulling it off is a lot harder than Harlock & Thomas make it look.

Beyond that, there was the question of just what these two were going to tell me (or any fan of Hicks) that I didn’t already know. For starters, there is footage of a very young Bill Hicks at the Comix Annex doing bits that illustrate how obvious his direction would be, how prescient and precocious his wit was. There is a detailed story of his time in Los Angeles, his collaborations with Dwight Slade and Kevin Booth… though only a glancing mention of Ninja Bachelor Party, but no film is perfect and few are fourteen hours long… his relationship with David Johndrow and his family life beyond what was in his material. For the casual fan, if there is such a thing, or the person unfamiliar with arguably the finest American comic mind in the 20th Century, American details the roller coaster ride that was his career. It makes clear the extent of his substance abuse issues, which is something that took him to deeper and darker places than we might’ve known.

On this point, they do well to avoid the clichéd tale of a great performer battling with demons to emerge from his cocoon sober and stronger, ready to share what he has learned. This isn’t so hard a feat, given that Hicks conquered his addictions (most of them, anyway) just in time to die at a ludicrously young age. Tackling this bit of information is where the wheat and chaff are separated. Again, Harlock & Thomas manage to convey the story from birth to death in a way fitting their subject. Though a hagiography is what Hicks deserves, there is nothing maudlin or dramatic in American; rather, they handled it in the way that it must have been for all involved, which is to say, absurd. To put it another way, The Bill Hicks Story isn’t one for Dickens. It is better told by Beckett. This team is neck deep and singing.

American is worthy of shelving next to your Sane Man DVD, under your oil painting, next to your quote board. If you’re not an obsessive fan of Hicks, it is still worth attending and owning when available. If you’re not a fan at all, then you probably haven’t made it this far, because you’re mouthing out the first paragraph while the rest of us are down here evolving. No film can adequately encapsulate the man whose influence is so wide ranging, whose cosmology and understanding of society were so advanced. It can’t possibly give a real indication of just how funny Bill Hicks was, or how grand it truly is to have had a person worthy of comparisons to Juvenal in front of a video camera here in the U.S. and in the U.K. It can’t tell you just how pitch-perfect the Revelations performance was, but it can tell you how he got there. Harlock & Thomas manage to do this, and to do it in a reserved manner, letting the story tell itself in the way it needs to be told. When it comes to Hicks, we will always be left wanting more. Too bad for humanity that he isn’t with us today, though it is hard to imagine him seeing the past decade without suffering multiple aneurysms from the sheer madness and idiocy we are capable of unleashing on ourselves and the world. Too bad. As Mary Hicks says in the film, ‘Bill… you should’ve known him, is all I can say.’

American opens in theaters 8 April 2011.

—–

American: The Bill Hicks Story
by Matt Harlock & Paul Thomas
Color, 2011, 101 minutes




 
May
27
    

The Documentary Films .Net site has never been casually used to help raise funds for charity.  However in the last year members of our staff have have had the pleasure of meeting a great couple who are both dealing with cancer while raising their young son.  At the moment, neither of their cancers are life threatening, but they and millions of others struggle with cancer’s affects every day.  Both are involved in the American Cancer Society’s Relay For Life event, so the publishers of the site felt it would be an event worthy of bringing to the attention of our readers.

Josh Davis, this site’s publisher will be walking at the Lawrence, Kansas Relay For Life held at the Free State High School track.  The event will be held overnight starting in the evening on June 13th.  Teammates will be walking throughout the night to raise awareness and funds to fight cancer.

If you are interested in donating, you can do it online via credit card directly to the American Cancer Society.  Donations can be accompanied by a note honoring someone you know who has been touched by cancer.

A link to my event webpage is provided below.

http://main.acsevents.org/site/TR/RelayForLife/RelayForLifeHighPlainsDivision?pg=personal&fr_id=5537&fr_id=5537&px=6458351

Any donation no matter how small is appreciated.


 
Apr
28
    

By  Bryan Newbury
April 28, 2008

A person’s views on the death penalty don’t just change. They evolve. When someone takes the time to investigate the process and the punishment, the only intelligent conclusion he can arrive at is that capital punishment is a barbaric miscarriage of justice. This seems to be the case At the Death House Door puts forward, and it would be difficult to argue to the contrary.

Most who maintain a fervently anti-death penalty stance have a Road to Damascus moment in which the act of a state killing in order to discourage killing unravels before them. For some, it was the case of Roger Keith Coleman of Grundy, Virginia. In 1992, Coleman became a cause célébre. All the pieces seemed to fall into place. Here was a coal miner who seemed to have had to complete a decathlonesque performance en route to the rape and murder of his sister-in-law. Key evidence seemed to point to at least a shadow of a doubt. Governor Wilder was up for reelection, and seemed to be hearing none of the case.

The same year saw the execution of Ricky Ray Rector. Though the evidence of his guilt wasn’t in question, the issue of trying, convicting and executing a man who was essentially retarded shone a light on the craven political advantage in vengeance and blood lust. Governor Bill Clinton took the time to return to Arkansas, mid-campaign, in order to make sure the execution transpired. 

The Damascus moment isn’t perfect. Subsequent DNA evidence suggests that Coleman was guilty after all. Rector wasn’t born mentally retarded. He was unfit as the result of a suicide attempt after the crime, which effectively lobotomized him. Realizing this after the fact doesn’t put the genie back in the lamp. After the process of investigation begins, the convert retains some of that doubt in the system. “This may be the case in this instance,” he thinks, “but, how many cases like this are out there?”

In Texas, there are a lot, and no Saul could have a more palpable case than Reverend Carroll Pickett of Huntsville. 

At the Death House Door examines the life and career path of Pickett, a Presbyterian minister who leaves his church to become a prison chaplain. Like everything else in Pickett’s story, this decision is rife with complexities. His church was flourishing and his stature in the community had seen a meteoric rise. This came at the expense of his marriage, which he sought to save by keeping a lower profile as prison chaplain. That these were the grounds that saw two of his congregation slain in a prison hostage standoff didn’t make the decision any easier. In fact, five years prior to his accepting the prison chaplain job he’d vowed to never set foot in the prison again. 

History had other ideas. Not only did he take the job… shortly after assuming the post, the state of Texas reinstituted executions. Pickett was soon named “death house chaplain,” ministering to the condemned on the day their sentence would be carried out. So much for the low profile.  

The film displays a grace with counterpoints and storylines that is rare. Pickett’s personal tale is engrossing, and though it plays heavily into the death penalty debate, it is one worthy of a feature length film in itself. Pickett’s life plays out in odd and harmonious ways. The discordant elements that go with his vocation are brought to light – most eloquently in a family dinner and interviews with his current spouse – while his creativity in coping with unpleasant realities continually amazes. There is hardly a wasted second in the 90 plus minutes of At the Death House Door. Indeed, each side story is worthy of an in-depth piece. From the formation of a prison choir, which takes root in all manner of positive ways, to the ubiquitous gray area of the guilty and the innocent, to his collection of cassette tapes, the subject and the work enlighten, enrage and astonish.

A word about the tapes. When James and Gilbert first saw and heard Pickett’s collection, they must’ve danced inside. It is hard to comprehend a testament more valuable than Pickett narrating his experiences after each execution. From Charlie Brooks (the first lethal injection in the state of Texas) in 1982 to the final condemned man he’d ministered to in 1995, these “tears,” as a family member called them, referring to his stern upbringing and inability to emote, serve as an invaluable record of Huntsville in particular and capital punishment in general. 

Two executions play key roles, those of Ignacio Cuevas and Carlos De Luna. These men relate the Janus-faced evils of the death penalty: 1. That killing the guilty doesn’t provide closure to the families of the victims; 2. If you execute an innocent man, there’s no chance to correct the mistake.

It is hard to imagine Pickett wanting to see anyone executed more than Cuevas. Here was the man who’d murdered two of his parishioners during the siege of 1974. On the other hand, it must have been the longest day Pickett had spent in the Walls Unit. Cuevas eventually offers a confession and subsequent retraction, which couldn’t have helped Pickett’s outlook. Even with a seeming lack of contrition, and an iron-clad case against Cuevas for doing the crime, the punishment rings hollow. As a daughter of one of the victims is quoted as saying, “This does not bring closure… there is nothing that happened in that building that could bring her back. [She’s] dead and he’s dead, and that’s just two dead people.” 

In some ways, this is the easier case against the death penalty. Its merits and malfunctions exist in ether when related to the possibly or even probably innocent. When an assertion of innocence is stated, there will always be an argument that the inmate was found guilty in trial and on appeal. Even with DNA evidence, there will be a case to be made that the convicted man or, in rare instances, woman, was simply good at covering up the tracks. That the legal system will go out of its way to presume guilt is bad enough… that the punishment manifests itself as a hollow and crude tool of vengeance rather than justice puts the issue in full perspective. 

De Luna is the classic case of justice miscarried. He was convicted of killing a gas station clerk in Corpus Christi in 1983. Circumstances were unkind to Carlos De Luna, who was a small-time criminal. The police found him under a truck. He’d been hiding, he said, because he was violating parole. Drinking. Despite the fact that he had no blood on him (the murder was committed with a knife, and the scene was that of a slaughterhouse killing floor) witnesses identified him as the man the police were after. That he bore a striking resemblance to Carlos Hernandez, whose knife, incidentally, was the one found at the scene, didn’t help his case. The “line-up” was De Luna alone, in a police car, minutes after the murder. De Luna repeatedly offered up Carlos Hernandez as the killer. His pleas fell on deaf ears, as is so often the case with police, defense attorneys, prosecutors and judges. After all, why bother to trade in the brown man you’ve convicted in order to repeat the messy process? 

Despite media attention and the mounting evidence in support of his innocence, De Luna was executed on 7 December 1989. Of course, his execution was botched, causing a bit of extra pain on the way out. 

De Luna’s case changed Pickett, who remains staunchly conservative. That this is no Helen Prejean adds more heft still. He eventually leaves the Walls and takes up with Rose Rhoton, De Luna’s sister, in an effort to abolish the death penalty. As with so much of At the Death House Door, Rhoton could doubtless be a compelling feature subject in her own right. Just as executing Cuevas didn’t bring back Pickett’s parishioners, abolishing the death penalty won’t right what happened to her brother. Still, one hopes Pickett and Rhoton manage to enlighten people into at least considering the abolition of this uncivilized practice.

Towards the end of the film, Pickett describes the changes made in execution day itinerary following his departure. Where Pickett spent the entire day with the condemned in preparation and ministering, “now they bring him in at 4:00 PM and two hours later, it’s time to kill him.” The scene that follows this revelation informs us of just how indifferent we have become, even in relationship to the Reagan years. 

Recommending viewing of At the Death House Door is one of the easiest calls a reviewer can make. James and Gilbert have managed to succeed on all fronts. The storytelling is superb, the pacing perfect, the people compelling and the case made. The sole difficulty comes in attempting to find a chink in the armor. It simply isn’t there. When all is said and done, At the Death House Door is likely the best documentary release of 2008, and in all probability among the top 10 of the decade. They’ve managed to do more than splendidly document the story of Carrol J. Pickett, Carlos De Luna, Ignacio Cuevas and the overall issue they’ve chosen to tackle. This film is a work of art.

—–

Directed & Produced by Steve James & Peter Gilbert

Executive Produced by Gordon Quinn

Kartemquin Films

2008, 95 minutes

Premiers on IFC TV May 29 at 9 pm ET/PT